https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380606 The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the legality of detention orders under the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner agreed to provide a bank guarantee for tax and penalty amounts demanded but raised concerns about continuous bank guarantee maintenance. The Court directed the petitioner to submit the bank guarantee within two days for the release of goods, with the respondent ordered to release the goods within twelve hours of receipt. The respondent was instructed to complete the enquiry, provide a fair opportunity to the petitioner, and communicate the order within four weeks, relieving the petitioner from maintaining the bank guarantee beyond six weeks if not complied with. en-us Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Mar 2025 18:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380606 The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the legality of detention orders under the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner agreed to provide a bank guarantee for tax and penalty amounts demanded but raised concerns about continuous bank guarantee maintenance. The Court directed the petitioner to submit the bank guarantee within two days for the release of goods, with the respondent ordered to release the goods within twelve hours of receipt. The respondent was instructed to complete the enquiry, provide a fair opportunity to the petitioner, and communicate the order within four weeks, relieving the petitioner from maintaining the bank guarantee beyond six weeks if not complied with. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380606