<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1331 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380603</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal and writ petition after the appellant withdrew the challenge to the first question in view of a settlement reached under the Mutual Agreement Procedure, and the second question was treated as no longer surviving. The operative effect was that no further adjudication was required on either question once the settlement resolved the first issue and rendered the remaining issue infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 12:08:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1331 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380603</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal and writ petition after the appellant withdrew the challenge to the first question in view of a settlement reached under the Mutual Agreement Procedure, and the second question was treated as no longer surviving. The operative effect was that no further adjudication was required on either question once the settlement resolved the first issue and rendered the remaining issue infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>