<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s claim of underinvestment u/s 69B dismissed due to lack of evidence; no income addition for assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46739</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69B - assessee purchased the land directly from PISCO at the prevalent circle rate - the presumption of the AO could not lead to a conclusion of under investment by the assessee, liable for addition - The burden was on the department to prove understatement of sale consideration which was not discharged - no addition</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 12:08:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 12:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s claim of underinvestment u/s 69B dismissed due to lack of evidence; no income addition for assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46739</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69B - assessee purchased the land directly from PISCO at the prevalent circle rate - the presumption of the AO could not lead to a conclusion of under investment by the assessee, liable for addition - The burden was on the department to prove understatement of sale consideration which was not discharged - no addition</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 12:08:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>