<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the legal principle that such penalties do not survive when the tax liability is ultimately computed under section 115JB of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 12:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the legal principle that such penalties do not survive when the tax liability is ultimately computed under section 115JB of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>