<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1323 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380595</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction claimed under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal held that the subsequent cancellation of the institution&#039;s registration did not invalidate the deduction claim if the donation was made when the registration was valid. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, with other issues deemed academic or consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1323 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380595</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction claimed under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal held that the subsequent cancellation of the institution&#039;s registration did not invalidate the deduction claim if the donation was made when the registration was valid. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, with other issues deemed academic or consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>