<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1319 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to revise the assessment under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not conducted adequate inquiries and had accepted inaccurate submissions from the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations by the AO to determine the true nature of transactions and income sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1319 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to revise the assessment under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not conducted adequate inquiries and had accepted inaccurate submissions from the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations by the AO to determine the true nature of transactions and income sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>