<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380586</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2010-11 was deleted by the Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled that since the deduction under section 54 of the Act was allowed in the quantum appeal, the basis for the penalty no longer existed. As the penalty was contingent on the disallowance of the deduction, which was overturned, it was deemed unjustified and hence deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380586</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2010-11 was deleted by the Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled that since the deduction under section 54 of the Act was allowed in the quantum appeal, the basis for the penalty no longer existed. As the penalty was contingent on the disallowance of the deduction, which was overturned, it was deemed unjustified and hence deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>