<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1304 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380576</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reversing the disallowance of commission expenses, upholding the addition on account of capital introduction, confirming the disallowance for excess depreciation, and reducing the disallowance for personal usage of expenses. Other grounds related to breach of law and Principles of Natural Justice, levying of interest under Section 234A/B/C/D, and initiation of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) were not separately adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1304 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380576</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reversing the disallowance of commission expenses, upholding the addition on account of capital introduction, confirming the disallowance for excess depreciation, and reducing the disallowance for personal usage of expenses. Other grounds related to breach of law and Principles of Natural Justice, levying of interest under Section 234A/B/C/D, and initiation of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) were not separately adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>