<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee regarding the rejection of refunds for Construction Service, Interior Decorator Service, Works Contract Service, and Air Travel Service. The decisions were based on the lack of nexus requirement, previous judgments, and relevant circulars. The Rent-a-Cab Service issue was not addressed as it was not part of the original scope of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 11:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee regarding the rejection of refunds for Construction Service, Interior Decorator Service, Works Contract Service, and Air Travel Service. The decisions were based on the lack of nexus requirement, previous judgments, and relevant circulars. The Rent-a-Cab Service issue was not addressed as it was not part of the original scope of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>