https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380562 The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal for refund/rebate claims related to services used beyond the place of removal for the export of goods. It found that services availed up to the destination of the buyer of the goods should be eligible for refund/rebate. The Tribunal determined that the rejection of refund claims for specified services used in export activities was unjustified and against the law. Consequently, it set aside the rejection of refund claims and granted the rebate disallowed by the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing the appeals with any consequential reliefs. en-us Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 May 2019 11:49:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380562 The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal for refund/rebate claims related to services used beyond the place of removal for the export of goods. It found that services availed up to the destination of the buyer of the goods should be eligible for refund/rebate. The Tribunal determined that the rejection of refund claims for specified services used in export activities was unjustified and against the law. Consequently, it set aside the rejection of refund claims and granted the rebate disallowed by the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing the appeals with any consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380562