https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280869 A substituted conviction under section 419 read with section 109 IPC could not stand where no such charge had been framed, the accused had not been examined on that basis under section 342 CrPC, and the prosecution case was not tried on a cheating footing. The Court further noted that the proved facts showed only wrongful identification before the Oath Commissioner and did not establish cheating under section 415 IPC, since there was no inducement causing or likely to cause damage or harm to the Oath Commissioner in body, mind, reputation or property. The conviction was set aside. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 May 2019 11:37:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280869 A substituted conviction under section 419 read with section 109 IPC could not stand where no such charge had been framed, the accused had not been examined on that basis under section 342 CrPC, and the prosecution case was not tried on a cheating footing. The Court further noted that the proved facts showed only wrongful identification before the Oath Commissioner and did not establish cheating under section 415 IPC, since there was no inducement causing or likely to cause damage or harm to the Oath Commissioner in body, mind, reputation or property. The conviction was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280869