https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280857 A mutual armed clash amounting to a free fight was found on the evidence, based on prior enmity, mobilisation from different villages, and fatalities on both sides, so liability had to be assessed by specific attribution of fatal acts rather than a one-sided assault theory. The Court held that the trial court's reference to the case diary under Section 172(2) CrPC did not cause prejudice in the circumstances. Convictions under murder-related offences were sustained only against those specifically linked to the fatal injuries, and the benefit of acquittal was extended to similarly placed non-appealing co-accused on parity. en-us Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 May 2019 11:12:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280857 A mutual armed clash amounting to a free fight was found on the evidence, based on prior enmity, mobilisation from different villages, and fatalities on both sides, so liability had to be assessed by specific attribution of fatal acts rather than a one-sided assault theory. The Court held that the trial court's reference to the case diary under Section 172(2) CrPC did not cause prejudice in the circumstances. Convictions under murder-related offences were sustained only against those specifically linked to the fatal injuries, and the benefit of acquittal was extended to similarly placed non-appealing co-accused on parity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280857