<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CORRIGENDUM TO ORDER-IN-ORIGINAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8511</link>
    <description>Tax adjudication requires issuance of a show cause notice, opportunity to reply and hearing, and a reasoned order-in-original; rectification or corrigendum may correct arithmetical errors but enhancement of duty on rectification requires fresh opportunity. In the Lokesh Machines matter the Tribunal affirmed valuation adjustments and inclusion of undeclared receipts, treated the corrigendum as arithmetic correction, and set aside an unsupported penalty on the receiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:33:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:33:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CORRIGENDUM TO ORDER-IN-ORIGINAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8511</link>
      <description>Tax adjudication requires issuance of a show cause notice, opportunity to reply and hearing, and a reasoned order-in-original; rectification or corrigendum may correct arithmetical errors but enhancement of duty on rectification requires fresh opportunity. In the Lokesh Machines matter the Tribunal affirmed valuation adjustments and inclusion of undeclared receipts, treated the corrigendum as arithmetic correction, and set aside an unsupported penalty on the receiver.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:33:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>