<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 56 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18238</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld penalties for concealed income of Rs. 4,800 and Rs. 18,375 but set aside the penalty for Rs. 20,214. The Court found that the assessee failed to disclose certain income in the original returns but allowed for inadvertent errors in the revised return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:14:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 56 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18238</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld penalties for concealed income of Rs. 4,800 and Rs. 18,375 but set aside the penalty for Rs. 20,214. The Court found that the assessee failed to disclose certain income in the original returns but allowed for inadvertent errors in the revised return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>