<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380546</link>
    <description>The Court held that the interest expenditure of the Assessee, related to Real Estate business, was capital in nature and not deductible for tax purposes as the projects had not generated income. The Court emphasized that deduction eligibility depended on asset utilization, overriding accounting methods. The Appeals were dismissed, affirming the importance of complying with statutory provisions for tax deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1274 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380546</link>
      <description>The Court held that the interest expenditure of the Assessee, related to Real Estate business, was capital in nature and not deductible for tax purposes as the projects had not generated income. The Court emphasized that deduction eligibility depended on asset utilization, overriding accounting methods. The Appeals were dismissed, affirming the importance of complying with statutory provisions for tax deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>