<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1262 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380534</link>
    <description>The appeals focused on the levy of penalties under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to additional income declared during a search action. The Tribunal found that the penalties were not sustainable as the additional income declared voluntarily lacked incriminating material, thus not constituting &quot;undisclosed income.&quot; Consequently, the penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, resulting in the deletion of penalties in all four cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:23:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1262 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380534</link>
      <description>The appeals focused on the levy of penalties under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to additional income declared during a search action. The Tribunal found that the penalties were not sustainable as the additional income declared voluntarily lacked incriminating material, thus not constituting &quot;undisclosed income.&quot; Consequently, the penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, resulting in the deletion of penalties in all four cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>