<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1251 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380523</link>
    <description>The court directed respondent No.2 to decide on the representation submitted by the petitioner within 15 days. The petitioner imported goods from Pakistan before the issuance of the notification dated 16.2.2019, which imposed a duty rate of 200% on goods imported from Pakistan. The petitioner argued for the release of goods without applying the new notification, as they had already paid the assessed amount online. The court ordered respondent No.2 to decide on the petitioner&#039;s representation seeking relief from the duty within the specified timeframe, ensuring due process and the petitioner&#039;s right to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1251 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380523</link>
      <description>The court directed respondent No.2 to decide on the representation submitted by the petitioner within 15 days. The petitioner imported goods from Pakistan before the issuance of the notification dated 16.2.2019, which imposed a duty rate of 200% on goods imported from Pakistan. The petitioner argued for the release of goods without applying the new notification, as they had already paid the assessed amount online. The court ordered respondent No.2 to decide on the petitioner&#039;s representation seeking relief from the duty within the specified timeframe, ensuring due process and the petitioner&#039;s right to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>