https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18234 The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in treating income from properties inherited from the adoptive father as individual income instead of Hindu undivided family income, as determined by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Court clarified that the Tribunal's decision only applied to properties inherited from the natural father and widow, not those from the adoptive father. The High Court highlighted the need for consistency with the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision on the status of income from the adoptive father's properties. en-us Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:07:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18234 The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in treating income from properties inherited from the adoptive father as individual income instead of Hindu undivided family income, as determined by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Court clarified that the Tribunal's decision only applied to properties inherited from the natural father and widow, not those from the adoptive father. The High Court highlighted the need for consistency with the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision on the status of income from the adoptive father's properties. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18234