<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty for Missing Goods in Customs Warehouse Dropped; Regulation 12(8) Penalty Set Aside After Appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46732</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - Warehousing of goods - Goods missing when it was in their custody - The impugned order is contradictory because the Commissioner has dropped the proceedings against the appellant under Regulation 11 &amp; 12 but in the order portion, he still imposed penalty under Regulation 12(8) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulations 2009. - Penalty set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:05:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:05:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty for Missing Goods in Customs Warehouse Dropped; Regulation 12(8) Penalty Set Aside After Appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46732</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - Warehousing of goods - Goods missing when it was in their custody - The impugned order is contradictory because the Commissioner has dropped the proceedings against the appellant under Regulation 11 &amp; 12 but in the order portion, he still imposed penalty under Regulation 12(8) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulations 2009. - Penalty set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:05:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>