<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380511</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal, rejecting the refund claim of Rs. 1,78,240/- as time-barred under the one-year limitation period set by Notification No. 93/2008 and Section 27 of the Customs Act. The decision emphasized the strict interpretation of statutory provisions and notifications, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling that favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 08:03:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380511</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal, rejecting the refund claim of Rs. 1,78,240/- as time-barred under the one-year limitation period set by Notification No. 93/2008 and Section 27 of the Customs Act. The decision emphasized the strict interpretation of statutory provisions and notifications, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling that favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>