<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1226 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the subsidy received under the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme - 2010 should not be included in the transaction value for calculating Central Excise Duty. The Appeals were allowed, emphasizing the distinction between subsidy and remission schemes. The Tribunal held that the financial assistance provided under the Scheme was not to be considered part of the transaction value for Central Excise Duty calculation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 07:25:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1226 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the subsidy received under the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme - 2010 should not be included in the transaction value for calculating Central Excise Duty. The Appeals were allowed, emphasizing the distinction between subsidy and remission schemes. The Tribunal held that the financial assistance provided under the Scheme was not to be considered part of the transaction value for Central Excise Duty calculation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>