<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1354 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280837</link>
    <description>Challenges to a secured creditor&#039;s sale under the SARFAESI framework must be pursued before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17, including where winding-up proceedings are pending. The SARFAESI Act permits enforcement of security without court intervention and contains an overriding provision, while the specialised Tribunal has jurisdiction to examine enforcement measures. The Official Liquidator cannot bypass that statutory forum by seeking to set aside the auction sale before the Company Court. Accordingly, the Company Court application challenging the sale was not maintainable, and the sale challenge had to be brought before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 06:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1354 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280837</link>
      <description>Challenges to a secured creditor&#039;s sale under the SARFAESI framework must be pursued before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17, including where winding-up proceedings are pending. The SARFAESI Act permits enforcement of security without court intervention and contains an overriding provision, while the specialised Tribunal has jurisdiction to examine enforcement measures. The Official Liquidator cannot bypass that statutory forum by seeking to set aside the auction sale before the Company Court. Accordingly, the Company Court application challenging the sale was not maintainable, and the sale challenge had to be brought before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>