https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280844 The Supreme Court ruled that the recruitment process must follow the qualifications stated in the original advertisement and the rules in place at the start of the process. It criticized the Commission for deviating from the advertised qualifications and including candidates with different qualifications based on a subsequent clarification. The Court emphasized that equivalence of qualifications must be recognized before the recruitment process begins, and candidates cannot claim eligibility based on clarifications issued post-application. The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision, reinstated the Single Judge's ruling, and directed compliance with the qualifications outlined in the original advertisement. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 May 2019 06:32:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280844 The Supreme Court ruled that the recruitment process must follow the qualifications stated in the original advertisement and the rules in place at the start of the process. It criticized the Commission for deviating from the advertised qualifications and including candidates with different qualifications based on a subsequent clarification. The Court emphasized that equivalence of qualifications must be recognized before the recruitment process begins, and candidates cannot claim eligibility based on clarifications issued post-application. The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision, reinstated the Single Judge's ruling, and directed compliance with the qualifications outlined in the original advertisement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280844