<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (8) TMI 179 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280823</link>
    <description>A tribunal proceeding is vitiated where a member closely related to one party participates from the outset, because the appearance and likelihood of bias undermine the requirement of an impartial hearing. The proceedings were also held illegal where a spot inspection and local enquiry were conducted without notice to the parties, and material gathered was relied upon without recording evidence, examining witnesses, or allowing cross-examination as required by the statutory procedure and natural justice. The impugned occupancy-right order and the proceedings leading to it were quashed, and rehearing before an impartial tribunal with due opportunity to all parties was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 17:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (8) TMI 179 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280823</link>
      <description>A tribunal proceeding is vitiated where a member closely related to one party participates from the outset, because the appearance and likelihood of bias undermine the requirement of an impartial hearing. The proceedings were also held illegal where a spot inspection and local enquiry were conducted without notice to the parties, and material gathered was relied upon without recording evidence, examining witnesses, or allowing cross-examination as required by the statutory procedure and natural justice. The impugned occupancy-right order and the proceedings leading to it were quashed, and rehearing before an impartial tribunal with due opportunity to all parties was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>