<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 70 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18224</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the tax authorities&#039; duty to verify asset values before imposing penalties under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court found that the Tribunal prematurely concluded on the incorrectness of asset valuation, highlighting the need for proper assessment procedures to ensure fairness and statutory compliance in wealth-tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 70 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18224</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the tax authorities&#039; duty to verify asset values before imposing penalties under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court found that the Tribunal prematurely concluded on the incorrectness of asset valuation, highlighting the need for proper assessment procedures to ensure fairness and statutory compliance in wealth-tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>