<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18223</link>
    <description>Death of a partner was treated as potentially dissolving the firm unless the partnership deed contained a term preserving its continuance. The Court noted that the deed was not on record, so the legal effect of the partner&#039;s death could not be finally determined without examining that document. It stated that, absent such a clause, the firm would stand dissolved on death and the assessment for the relevant year would require two separate assessments, one for the pre-dissolution period and another for the post-dissolution period. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after considering the partnership deed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:40:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18223</link>
      <description>Death of a partner was treated as potentially dissolving the firm unless the partnership deed contained a term preserving its continuance. The Court noted that the deed was not on record, so the legal effect of the partner&#039;s death could not be finally determined without examining that document. It stated that, absent such a clause, the firm would stand dissolved on death and the assessment for the relevant year would require two separate assessments, one for the pre-dissolution period and another for the post-dissolution period. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after considering the partnership deed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>