<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 918 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280818</link>
    <description>The court set aside the lower courts&#039; decisions granting specific performance of the agreement to Kartar Singh. The suit for specific performance was dismissed, and the suit for declaration and rendition of accounts was upheld. The court found that the agreement was executed under undue influence and as security for a loan, not a genuine sale. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 13:04:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 918 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280818</link>
      <description>The court set aside the lower courts&#039; decisions granting specific performance of the agreement to Kartar Singh. The suit for specific performance was dismissed, and the suit for declaration and rendition of accounts was upheld. The court found that the agreement was executed under undue influence and as security for a loan, not a genuine sale. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>