<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 113 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18221</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying extra-shift allowance for certain machinery and plants marked with &#039;NESA&#039; under the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court emphasized that the legislative intent was clear in excluding machinery with the &#039;NESA&#039; inscription from eligibility for extra-shift allowance. The court criticized the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision for allowing the allowance on such machinery, stating it was erroneous and contrary to the rules. Chief Justice V. N. Khare concurred with the judgment, directing the transmission of the opinion to the Tribunal for appropriate action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:36:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 113 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18221</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying extra-shift allowance for certain machinery and plants marked with &#039;NESA&#039; under the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court emphasized that the legislative intent was clear in excluding machinery with the &#039;NESA&#039; inscription from eligibility for extra-shift allowance. The court criticized the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision for allowing the allowance on such machinery, stating it was erroneous and contrary to the rules. Chief Justice V. N. Khare concurred with the judgment, directing the transmission of the opinion to the Tribunal for appropriate action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>