<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 363 - SUPREME COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280817</link>
    <description>A rational short-listing criterion for interview was permissible where applications far exceeded vacancies and selection was by interview alone. The statutory minimum eligibility for appointment remained five years&#039; practice under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960, and the Commission did not alter that requirement by calling only candidates with seven and a half years&#039; practice. The higher threshold was treated as part of the selection process to manage the interview pool, provided it had a nexus with the objective of identifying the best candidates and was not arbitrary. The short-listing method was upheld and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 11:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 363 - SUPREME COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280817</link>
      <description>A rational short-listing criterion for interview was permissible where applications far exceeded vacancies and selection was by interview alone. The statutory minimum eligibility for appointment remained five years&#039; practice under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960, and the Commission did not alter that requirement by calling only candidates with seven and a half years&#039; practice. The higher threshold was treated as part of the selection process to manage the interview pool, provided it had a nexus with the objective of identifying the best candidates and was not arbitrary. The short-listing method was upheld and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>