https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280816 Where an advertisement permits restricting the number of candidates to a reasonable limit when applications are numerous, shortlisting on the basis of qualifications and experience higher than the minimum prescribed is a legitimate screening method. The Commission's use of a four-year experience criterion, instead of the minimum three years, was a rational threshold for narrowing the field of consideration. The shortlisting was therefore valid, and the Tribunal erred in disapproving it; the selection process was not liable to be remitted for fresh processing on that ground. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 May 2019 11:17:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280816 Where an advertisement permits restricting the number of candidates to a reasonable limit when applications are numerous, shortlisting on the basis of qualifications and experience higher than the minimum prescribed is a legitimate screening method. The Commission's use of a four-year experience criterion, instead of the minimum three years, was a rational threshold for narrowing the field of consideration. The shortlisting was therefore valid, and the Tribunal erred in disapproving it; the selection process was not liable to be remitted for fresh processing on that ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280816