<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1206 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380478</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the validity of Re-assessment Proceedings beyond the four-year limitation period, emphasizing the necessity for the Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose relevant materials to invoke the extended limitation. The court reiterated that failure to specifically record such reasons vitiates the notice and proceedings. Additionally, the court agreed with the Tribunal that Re-assessment Proceedings initiated on a mere change of opinion, without new tangible material, were not justified. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, concluding that no substantial legal question arose in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 07:27:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1206 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380478</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the validity of Re-assessment Proceedings beyond the four-year limitation period, emphasizing the necessity for the Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose relevant materials to invoke the extended limitation. The court reiterated that failure to specifically record such reasons vitiates the notice and proceedings. Additionally, the court agreed with the Tribunal that Re-assessment Proceedings initiated on a mere change of opinion, without new tangible material, were not justified. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, concluding that no substantial legal question arose in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>