<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1173 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to SEBI, emphasizing compliance with Regulation 8 of the SAST Regulations. It highlighted the importance of providing the appellant with an opportunity to review and object to the valuation report before any decision on offer price revision. The Tribunal stressed the need for procedural fairness and adherence to regulatory requirements in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 07:03:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1173 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to SEBI, emphasizing compliance with Regulation 8 of the SAST Regulations. It highlighted the importance of providing the appellant with an opportunity to review and object to the valuation report before any decision on offer price revision. The Tribunal stressed the need for procedural fairness and adherence to regulatory requirements in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>