<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1612 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280799</link>
    <description>A general cross objection challenging the acceptance of comparable companies was insufficient to require the Tribunal to examine exclusion of three named comparables. Because no specific ground sought their exclusion, the Tribunal had no occasion to adjudicate their comparability on that basis. The request for modification was therefore rejected, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 06:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1612 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280799</link>
      <description>A general cross objection challenging the acceptance of comparable companies was insufficient to require the Tribunal to examine exclusion of three named comparables. Because no specific ground sought their exclusion, the Tribunal had no occasion to adjudicate their comparability on that basis. The request for modification was therefore rejected, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>