<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1145 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280793</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the ld CIT(A) to reconsider the case based on the explanation provided regarding the remittance date of the self-assessed tax and any delay. The Tribunal emphasized that the date of tax remittance should rectify the filing defect, and any delay must be satisfactorily explained by the assessee for the ld CIT(A) to condone it and proceed with adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 06:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1145 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280793</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the ld CIT(A) to reconsider the case based on the explanation provided regarding the remittance date of the self-assessed tax and any delay. The Tribunal emphasized that the date of tax remittance should rectify the filing defect, and any delay must be satisfactorily explained by the assessee for the ld CIT(A) to condone it and proceed with adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>