<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1619 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act was not justifiable as no incriminating material was found during the search, and the additional income declared was on an ad-hoc basis. The penalty of Rs. 7,55,539/- was deleted, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized that the imposition of penalties should be based on proper application of mind and reference to tangible material, rather than being an automatic consequence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 06:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1619 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act was not justifiable as no incriminating material was found during the search, and the additional income declared was on an ad-hoc basis. The penalty of Rs. 7,55,539/- was deleted, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized that the imposition of penalties should be based on proper application of mind and reference to tangible material, rather than being an automatic consequence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>