https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280815 A civil appeal was held liable to dismissal because a 639-day delay in filing was not satisfactorily explained, so condonation was refused. The Court also examined the matter on substance and found no merit in the appeal, leading to dismissal on merits as well. The appeal was therefore dismissed both for want of condonation of delay and on substantive grounds. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 May 2019 06:17:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280815 A civil appeal was held liable to dismissal because a 639-day delay in filing was not satisfactorily explained, so condonation was refused. The Court also examined the matter on substance and found no merit in the appeal, leading to dismissal on merits as well. The appeal was therefore dismissed both for want of condonation of delay and on substantive grounds. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280815