<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (9) TMI 187 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280788</link>
    <description>An antiseptic preparation marketed for minor sores, cuts, skin injuries and infection prevention may be treated as a drug rather than a cosmetic because its composition, label and uses show curative and preventive character. The article also states that breach of a price-control order made under the Essential Commodities Act is punishable under Section 7 once contravention of an order under Section 3 is shown, and later inclusion of drugs as essential commodities does not affect the offence for the relevant period. It further notes that absence of deliberate intent may justify moderation of sentence and that liability in a firm context attaches to persons in charge of business and the actual seller.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 15:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (9) TMI 187 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280788</link>
      <description>An antiseptic preparation marketed for minor sores, cuts, skin injuries and infection prevention may be treated as a drug rather than a cosmetic because its composition, label and uses show curative and preventive character. The article also states that breach of a price-control order made under the Essential Commodities Act is punishable under Section 7 once contravention of an order under Section 3 is shown, and later inclusion of drugs as essential commodities does not affect the offence for the relevant period. It further notes that absence of deliberate intent may justify moderation of sentence and that liability in a firm context attaches to persons in charge of business and the actual seller.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>