<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1007 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280784</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order regarding deduction under section 80IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. The CIT(A) allowed relief to the assessee but restricted the deduction to profits earned on manufacturing done in March 2006 only, resulting in an addition of &amp;amp;8377; 4,17,987. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order, citing the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court. The decision was pronounced on 28/05/2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 10:07:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1007 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280784</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order regarding deduction under section 80IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. The CIT(A) allowed relief to the assessee but restricted the deduction to profits earned on manufacturing done in March 2006 only, resulting in an addition of &amp;amp;8377; 4,17,987. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order, citing the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court. The decision was pronounced on 28/05/2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>