<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 132 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18205</link>
    <description>The court found both reasons for reopening the assessment to be invalid. The notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings were quashed. The court emphasized its duty to intervene in cases of executive authority acting without jurisdiction. The application was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 132 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18205</link>
      <description>The court found both reasons for reopening the assessment to be invalid. The notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings were quashed. The court emphasized its duty to intervene in cases of executive authority acting without jurisdiction. The application was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>