<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1162 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on various issues. Notional interest on loans and advances was largely disallowed due to the use of interest-free surplus funds for investments. Expenses incurred through a credit card were deemed permissible, as personal expenses by directors cannot be disallowed in the company&#039;s hands. Personal expenses for a foreign tour were justified for business reasons and thus not added back. However, additions under section 68 of the Income-tax Act were confirmed in some cases due to insufficient evidence, and ad hoc disallowance of expenses was deleted for lack of specificity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1162 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on various issues. Notional interest on loans and advances was largely disallowed due to the use of interest-free surplus funds for investments. Expenses incurred through a credit card were deemed permissible, as personal expenses by directors cannot be disallowed in the company&#039;s hands. Personal expenses for a foreign tour were justified for business reasons and thus not added back. However, additions under section 68 of the Income-tax Act were confirmed in some cases due to insufficient evidence, and ad hoc disallowance of expenses was deleted for lack of specificity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>