<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1161 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380433</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) prevails over Section 206AA(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized that in cases of payments to non-residents, the tax rate under DTAA should apply, being more beneficial to the assessee than the 20% rate mandated by Section 206AA. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, directing the deletion of tax demand based on the DTAA&#039;s favorable tax rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1161 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380433</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) prevails over Section 206AA(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized that in cases of payments to non-residents, the tax rate under DTAA should apply, being more beneficial to the assessee than the 20% rate mandated by Section 206AA. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, directing the deletion of tax demand based on the DTAA&#039;s favorable tax rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>