<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1146 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380418</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling that the demand was not sustainable under the Finance Act, 1994. It held that the Revisionary Authority had exceeded the grounds raised in the initial show-cause notice, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1146 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380418</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling that the demand was not sustainable under the Finance Act, 1994. It held that the Revisionary Authority had exceeded the grounds raised in the initial show-cause notice, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>