<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1145 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the correct categorization of services and the waiver of penalties when duty and interest were paid timely. The Commissioner&#039;s review seeking penalties under Sections 76 and 78 was deemed unjustified, with the Tribunal setting aside the order and emphasizing the importance of discretion in penalty imposition within statutory limits. The decision highlighted the significance of statutory provisions, precedents, and discretion in penalty imposition under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1145 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the correct categorization of services and the waiver of penalties when duty and interest were paid timely. The Commissioner&#039;s review seeking penalties under Sections 76 and 78 was deemed unjustified, with the Tribunal setting aside the order and emphasizing the importance of discretion in penalty imposition within statutory limits. The decision highlighted the significance of statutory provisions, precedents, and discretion in penalty imposition under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>