<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1624 - PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld its findings, dismissing the appeals by the appellant-revenue as no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order due to lack of corroborative evidence and unsustainable demands on raw material shortages and average weighment. The duty demand was found unsustainable without incriminating documents or proof of clandestine removal of goods, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1624 - PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld its findings, dismissing the appeals by the appellant-revenue as no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order due to lack of corroborative evidence and unsustainable demands on raw material shortages and average weighment. The duty demand was found unsustainable without incriminating documents or proof of clandestine removal of goods, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>