<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1139 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380411</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled that commission received for promoting sales of goods in India by associated group companies abroad did not qualify as an export of service for the period 2008-09 to 27.02.2010 but qualified as export from 27.02.2010 to 30.06.2012 and post 01.07.2012. Reimbursements from associated group companies were not taxable if no CENVAT credit was availed. Foreign exchange remittances for services received from overseas associates were subject to Service Tax. The extended period of limitation was upheld due to suppression of facts, and penalties and interest were imposed. The matter was remanded for re-computation based on the tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 06:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1139 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380411</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled that commission received for promoting sales of goods in India by associated group companies abroad did not qualify as an export of service for the period 2008-09 to 27.02.2010 but qualified as export from 27.02.2010 to 30.06.2012 and post 01.07.2012. Reimbursements from associated group companies were not taxable if no CENVAT credit was availed. Foreign exchange remittances for services received from overseas associates were subject to Service Tax. The extended period of limitation was upheld due to suppression of facts, and penalties and interest were imposed. The matter was remanded for re-computation based on the tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>