<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1508 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280774</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeals, upholding that the failure to deduct tax at source by the assessee did not lead to disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The court relied on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, emphasizing that if the payee was not liable to pay tax in India on the received amounts, the disallowance provision would not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 06:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1508 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280774</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeals, upholding that the failure to deduct tax at source by the assessee did not lead to disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The court relied on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, emphasizing that if the payee was not liable to pay tax in India on the received amounts, the disallowance provision would not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>