https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280751 Officers in charge of a company's business may be prosecuted and convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the complaint and evidence show they placed orders, received goods and issued cheques, and separate notice to them is unnecessary when notice was served on the company. The revisional challenge on that ground therefore failed. Compensation awarded under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure may also be enforced by a sentence of imprisonment in default of payment, because the court is bound by Supreme Court precedent under Article 141. The conviction and sentence, including the default sentence, were confirmed. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 May 2019 16:54:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280751 Officers in charge of a company's business may be prosecuted and convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the complaint and evidence show they placed orders, received goods and issued cheques, and separate notice to them is unnecessary when notice was served on the company. The revisional challenge on that ground therefore failed. Compensation awarded under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure may also be enforced by a sentence of imprisonment in default of payment, because the court is bound by Supreme Court precedent under Article 141. The conviction and sentence, including the default sentence, were confirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280751