https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280749 The court held that the amount of royalty/compensation should not exceed the rent payable to the landlord. The determined royalty for Shop No. 6 was set at Rs. 750 per month, ensuring compliance with the Court Receiver's orders and execution of the Agency Agreement by Defendant No. 1 to preserve tenancy rights. The Chamber Summons were made absolute with the defendant directed to adhere to the court's directives, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the property during the legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 04 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 May 2019 16:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280749 The court held that the amount of royalty/compensation should not exceed the rent payable to the landlord. The determined royalty for Shop No. 6 was set at Rs. 750 per month, ensuring compliance with the Court Receiver's orders and execution of the Agency Agreement by Defendant No. 1 to preserve tenancy rights. The Chamber Summons were made absolute with the defendant directed to adhere to the court's directives, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the property during the legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280749