<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1093 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee was not in default for failing to deduct tax on medical reimbursements up to Rs. 15,000, supported by bills. The Tribunal also found that the AO had made a bona fide estimate of taxable salary and complied with statutory obligations under section 192. The appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 on the order u/s 154 was also dismissed as it became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 14:31:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1093 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee was not in default for failing to deduct tax on medical reimbursements up to Rs. 15,000, supported by bills. The Tribunal also found that the AO had made a bona fide estimate of taxable salary and complied with statutory obligations under section 192. The appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 on the order u/s 154 was also dismissed as it became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>