<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1135 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, confirming that the service provided by the Appellant was a works contract service and not a construction of complex service. The demand raised under the construction of complex service category was deemed invalid. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 29.04.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1135 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, confirming that the service provided by the Appellant was a works contract service and not a construction of complex service. The demand raised under the construction of complex service category was deemed invalid. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 29.04.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>